TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

James v. United States

James v. United States, 204 F.2d 733 (D.C. Cir. 1953)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 21, 1953
Docket
No. 11504_1
Judges
Edgerton, Clark, Fahy
Citations
204 F.2d 73392 U.S. App. D.C. 2751953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2515

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of entering a store with intent to steal, and of maliciously destroying property. His principle contentions are (1) that the officers who arrested him without a warrant had no probable cause to believe he had committed a felony, and therefore the evidence taken from him was illegally seized and should have been suppressed; and (2) the evidence presented at the trial was insufficient to convict. We find no error.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 119742026peak 1974 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Sylvester Kearney, Jr.498 F.2d 61 (D.C. Cir. 1974)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Sylvester Kearney, Jr.498 F.2d 61 (D.C. Cir. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list