Epps v. Gold
John Epps, Petitioner-Petitioner, v. Richard Gold, Et Al., Respondents-Respondents
Epps v. Gold, 160 A.2d 810 (N.J. 1960)
Opinion
Pee Curiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Ereund.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall and Schet tino—7.
For reversal—Hone.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.