Carolina Coach Co. v. Williams
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an award of $251 damages to a Negro passenger in an interstate bus on account of his having been wrongfully removed from the bus and prosecuted criminally for refusing to change his seat when ordered to do so by the bus driver. The defendant relies upon regulations of the bus company requiring the separate seating of white and Negro passengers. It appears that plaintiff was originally seated in accordance with the regulations and refused to change his seat when seats to *409 the rear, originally occupied by Negroes, had become vacant. We think that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed because the regulations relied on were applied by the bus driver in an unreasonable manner in requiring the passenger to change his seat in an interstate journey after he had been properly seated in accordance with the regulations. Chance v. Lambeth, 4 Cir., 186 F. 2d 879 ; Henderson v. United States, 339 U.S. 816 , 70 S.Ct. 843 , 94 L.Ed. 1302 ; Whiteside v. Southern Bus Co., 6 Cir., 177 F.2d 949 . Cf. Day v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp., 4 Cir., 171 F.2d 59 .
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court1
- U.S. Courts of Appeals2
- Federal District Courts2
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.