TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. Pugh & Barr, Inc.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pugh & Barr, Inc., 207 F.2d 409 (4th Cir. 1953)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 14, 1953
Docket
No. 6369
Judges
Parker, Soper, Dobie
Citations
207 F.2d 40933 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 20061953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3599

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce an order fixing the back pay of a discharged employee, Benjamin S. Bramer, in a case in which a general enforcement order was heretofore entered by this court. N. L. R. B. v. Pugh & Barr, Inc., 4 Cir., 194 F.2d 217 . Bramer was discharged on May 16, 1949 and declined re-employment on April 3, 1952. The Board’s order was arrived at by taking the wages paid during this period to Trader, another employee of similar grade, which amount to $7,361.42 and subtracting therefrom the interim earnings of Bra-mer on a quarterly basis, leaving a difference of $5,381.40, which is the amount respondent was ordered to pay Bramer. Bramer was an ordinary unskilled laborer and it appears that the large amount of back pay awarded him was due to the fact that the earnings credited for a period of two years was only $294.20. It is incredible that Bramer could not have earned more than this during that period if he had made reasonable efforts to find employment, when the evidence *410 shows that Trader during the same period was earning $5133.61. The Board seems to have reached the conclusion that it did on the basis that Bramer, having registered with the state unemployment agency, was not bound to make any further showing of diligence. We do not think that this is sufficient. The awarding of so large a sum as back pay without the finding of special circumstances justifying it cannot be sustained. We shall accordingly set aside the Board’s order and remand the case to the Board with direction that it make specific findings of fact with respect to the matter and award to Bramer no more than the difference between what he could have earned by working for respondent if he had not been wrongfully discharged and what he could have earned elsewhere if he had used due diligence to secure other employment.

Order set aside and case remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1955: 11956: 11957: 11959: 11966: 11967: 11972: 11973: 11974: 11987: 11992: 12011: 119552026peak 1955 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pugh & Barr, Inc., 194 F.2d 217 (4th Cir. 1952) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list