TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hickman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Hickman v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 207 F.2d 460 (4th Cir. 1953)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 14, 1953
Docket
No. 6672_1
Judges
Parker, Soper, Dobie
Citations
207 F.2d 460

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to review a decision of the Tax Court involving deductions from income taxes for the year 1945. Taxpayer owned a cottage in Cape May, New Jersey, which he had been renting for several years and which had acquired the status of business property. The cottage and contents were damaged by a storm in September 1944 and taxpayer made repairs the following year upon which he expended $3,059.18. He claimed a casualty loss for the year 1945 *461 on account of the storm damage, but the Commissioner refused to allow it for that year but did allow a deduction on account thereof for the year 1944. This was affirmed by the Tax Court. Taxpayer complains because he was not allowed the deduction for the year 1945 instead of 1944 and because it was not allowed in a larger amount. He complains, also, because a higher value was not put on the furniture in the house for purposes of depreciation allowance for the year 1945. He claimed in his return that the furniture should have been valued at $5,000, whereas it was valued by the Commissioner at $1,000 and this was affirmed by the Tax Court, that court finding that some of the furniture had been placed in the cottage for storage and was not depreciable in the same way as ordinary furnishings. The Board was clearly right in holding that the casualty loss was deductible in the year 1944 instead of 1945. The other matters involved are pure questions of fact as to which we are bound by the findings of the Tax Court unless we are prepared to hold that they are clearly wrong. We would not be justified in so holding.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1955: 11972: 11988: 119552026peak 1955 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. J. Russell Parsons and Margaret C. Parsons v. United States227 F.2d 437 (3d Cir. 1955)
  2. Sherlock v. Commissioner1972 T.C. Memo. 97
  3. Radding v. Commissioner1988 T.C. Memo. 250

Most recent

  1. Radding v. Commissioner1988 T.C. Memo. 250
  2. Sherlock v. Commissioner1972 T.C. Memo. 97
  3. J. Russell Parsons and Margaret C. Parsons v. United States227 F.2d 437 (3d Cir. 1955)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list