TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Clark v. Judge

Clark v. Judge, 210 A.2d 415 (N.J. 1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 24, 1965
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
210 A.2d 41544 N.J. 5501965 N.J. LEXIS 252

Opinion — Per Curiam

44 N.J. 550 (1965) 210 A.2d 415

ELIZABETH WYMOND CLARK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SURVIVING TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 6, 1935, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ELIZABETH McCLASKEY JUDGE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE WYMOND TRUST, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ANNETTE M. JUDGE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF GILBERT W. JUDGE, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND LOUIS H.H. JUDGE AND AUGUSTA G.C. JUDGE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 3, 1965. Argued May 4, 1965. Decided May 24, 1965.

Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause for appellant Annette M. Judge ( Messrs. Toner, Crowley, Woelper & Vanderbilt, attorneys; Mr. Roger M. Nelson, of counsel).

Mr. James C. McKay of the District of Columbia Bar argued the cause for appellant Elizabeth M. Judge ( Messrs. Kaufman, Kaufman & Kaufman, attorneys; Mr. Andrew L. *551 Kaufman, Mr. Frederick L. Kirgis, Jr. and Messrs. Covington & Burling of the District of Columbia Bar, of counsel).

Mr. Everett M. Scherer argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent ( Messrs. Riker, Danzig, Scherer & Brown, attorneys; Mr. Morton R. Covitz, Mr. Eli Whitney Debevoise of the New York Bar and Mr. Earle J. Starkey of the New York Bar, of counsel).

Mr. Bernard M. Shanley argued the cause for defendants-respondents ( Mr. F. Earl Walter, Jr. on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Pashman in the Superior Court.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1980: 11984: 22010: 119802026peak 1984 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)
  2. Benneman v. Pearl (In re Pearl)40 B.R. 860 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1984)
  3. Warren v. Township of Jackson1 N.J. Tax 536 (N.J. Tax Ct. 1980)
  4. Miller v. Miller478 A.2d 351 (N.J. 1984)

Most recent

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)
  2. Miller v. Miller478 A.2d 351 (N.J. 1984)
  3. Benneman v. Pearl (In re Pearl)40 B.R. 860 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1984)
  4. Warren v. Township of Jackson1 N.J. Tax 536 (N.J. Tax Ct. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list