United States. v. Zschach Const. Co.
UNITED STATES v. ZSCHACH CONST. CO. Et Al.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This appeal involves withholding and employment tax liability for the years 1948 and 1949.
The question is whether the court erred in failing to hold Pool Construction Company, the Western Casualty and Surety Company, the North American Casualty and Surety Reinsurance Corporation, and the Excess Insurance Company of America secondarily liable for the unpaid taxes of Zschach Construction Company to the extent of the amounts it deducted from its employees and then failed to pay over to the government.
It is conceded that this case is indistinguishable in fact or in law from that of United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States, 10 Cir., 1952, 201 F.2d 118 . The government, however, contends that our conclusions in that case are erroneous and asks us to reexamine the question and overrule our former decision. Suffice it to say we have given further consideration to the question presented and a majority of the court adheres to the views expressed in our former decision.
*348 The judgment appealed from is, therefore, Affirmed on authority of United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States, 10 Cir., 201 F.2d 118 . See, also, General Casualty Co. of America v. United States. 5 Cir., 205 F.2d 758 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- United States v. Seaboard Surety Company
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company, Inc.
- United States v. Crosland Construction Company, Inc., Pacific Employers Insurance Company, and American Indemnity Company
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. New York City Housing Authority
- National Bank of North America v. S. S. Oceanic Ondine
Most recent
- National Bank of North America v. S. S. Oceanic Ondine
- Cecil Nickell, D/B/A Cecil Nickell Construction Company, and United Benefit Fire Insurance Company of Omaha, Nebraska v. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Texas Vitrified Pipe Company, Cecil Nickell, D/B/A Cecil Nickell Construction Company, and United Benefit Fire Insurance Company of Omaha, Nebraska v. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Tex-Vit Manufacturing Company
- Nickell v. United States ex rel. Texas Vitrified Pipe Co.
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company, Inc.
- United States v. Seaboard Surety Company
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Board of Education
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.