Ingram v. United States
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Appellant waived trial by jury on a charge of violating the lottery laws, D. C.Code 1951, §§ 22-1501, 22-1502, 52 Stat. 198 -199. She was convicted. She afterwards urged, in support of a motion for a new trial, that her trial counsel “refused to permit her to testify” and failed to introduce certain other testimony. In our opinion the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, and its judgment placing the defendant on probation is Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 26 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.
- United States v. Georgia-Pacific Company
- Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air Force
- Kansas City Power & Light Company v. Douglas McKay Secretary of the Interior
- Lee T. Lovallo v. Robert F. Froehlke, Secretary of the Army and Major General John Hightower, Commanding General of Fort Hamilton Complex
- Doe v. United States Civil Service Commission
Most recent
- Trevor Cole v. Arthur M. Davis, Ronald F. Ham, Patricia G. Hooper, Thomas R. Miller, Sara A. Minor, June Montgomery, Jill Murray, and Debbie Rice
- Frander v. Frander, Inc. v. Griffen
- JR McCLENNEY AND SON, INC. v. Reimer
- Doe v. United States Civil Service Commission
- Narragansett Tribe of Indians v. Murphy
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.