Heidel v. Wallace & Tiernan
John Heidel, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Wallace & Tiernan, Respondent-Appellant
Heidel v. Wallace & Tiernan, 122 A.2d 180 (N.J. 1956)
Opinion
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conlon in the court below.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heiiee, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan—7.
For reversal—None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.