TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Berwind v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Berwind v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 211 F.2d 575 (3d Cir. 1954)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 16, 1954
Docket
No. 11201_1
Judges
McLaughlin, Kalodner, Hastie
Citations
211 F.2d 57545 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 8481954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4484

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, a director, depositor and shareholder in a trust company, loaned money to that company along with other “contracting stockholders” for the purpose of remedying an impairment to its capital. The loan became worthless in 1946. The trust company was affiliated with The Berwind-White Coal Mining Company. Petitioner was an officer and director in the latter corporation and in its other affiliated and subsidiary companies.

*576 He claimed a deduction in 1946 for the worthless debt as a loan incurred in his trade or business of being an officer and director in Berwind-White, its subsidiaries and affiliates, under Section 23 (e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 23 (e)(1), or as a business bad debt under Section 23(k)(l) or as a loss resulting from a transaction entered into for profit under Section 23 (e)(2).

We agree with the Tax Court that the transaction tax wise merely created a non-business creditor debtor relationship between petitioner and the trust company; that the resultant loss can only be deducted as a non-business bad debt under Section 23 (k) (4) of the Code and treated for tax purposes as a short term capital loss. Section 23(k)(l) covering business bad debts does not apply because petitioner as director or officer in the Berwind companies was an employee of those companies and cannot, as the Tax Court held, “* * * appropriate unto himself the business of the various corporations for which he works.”

The decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 30 cases

View all citing references →
1956: 21957: 31958: 41959: 41960: 41961: 51962: 11963: 11964: 11965: 11973: 11980: 11983: 219562026peak 1961 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Semel v. Commissioner1965 T.C. Memo. 232
  2. Rollins v. Commissioner32 T.C. 604 (Tax Ct. 1959)
  3. Pachella v. Commissioner37 T.C. 347 (Tax Ct. 1961)
  4. Vreeland v. Commissioner31 T.C. 78 (Tax Ct. 1958)
  5. Koppelman v. Commissioner27 T.C. 382 (Tax Ct. 1956)
  6. Lydon v. Commissioner1964 T.C. Memo. 27

Most recent

  1. Margolis v. United States570 F. Supp. 170 (N.D. Cal. 1983)
  2. Nalco Chemical Co. v. United States561 F. Supp. 1274 (N.D. Ill. 1983)
  3. Deely v. Commissioner73 T.C. 1081 (Tax Ct. 1980)
  4. Bernard v. Commissioner1973 T.C. Memo. 69
  5. Semel v. Commissioner1965 T.C. Memo. 232
  6. Lydon v. Commissioner1964 T.C. Memo. 27

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list