TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Russell v. United States

Russell v. United States, 212 F.2d 87 (4th Cir. 1954)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 7, 1954
Docket
No. 87
Judges
Parker, Soper, Dobie
Citations
212 F.2d 87

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion made under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate a sentence of imprisonment imposed upon a plea of guilty. The indictment charged in the first count that the appellant “being a person required to register and pay the special tax as provided by sections 3221 and 3220 of Title 26, United States Code” did have in his possession 2193 grains of heroin hydrochloride, without having registered and paid the special tax. A second count charged transportation of the drug from New York to Maryland. The appellant, being represented by counsel of his own choosing, voluntarily entered a plea of guilty to the indictment and was given a sentence of five years imprisonment and a fine of $2,000. The defendant contends that the second count of the indictment was dismissed, but an examination of the record shows that this is not true but that appellant was given a single sentence on both counts.

The appellant’s sole ground for the motion to vacate and set aside the sentence is that he was not a person required to register and pay the special tax as provided by the statute; but he voluntarily pleaded guilty to an indictment charging that he was such a person, and he may not now controvert his guilt as established by that plea. Furthermore, whether appellant was a person required to register and pay the special tax or not, his plea of guilty admits the charge of the second count of the indictment that he transported the heroin from one state to another, which is made a crime by 26 U.S.C. § 3224 (b) as amended, and the sentence imposed upon him is sustainable under that count.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1954: 11956: 21957: 11992: 119542026peak 1956 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Richard Hugh McGee242 F.2d 520 (7th Cir. 1957)
  2. Sol Kaye v. United States235 F.2d 187 (6th Cir. 1956)
  3. In re Wood123 F. Supp. 297 (W.D. Ky. 1954)
  4. Munger v. United States827 F. Supp. 100 (N.D.N.Y. 1992)
  5. United States v. McGee144 F. Supp. 466 (N.D. Ind. 1956)

Most recent

  1. Munger v. United States827 F. Supp. 100 (N.D.N.Y. 1992)
  2. United States v. Richard Hugh McGee242 F.2d 520 (7th Cir. 1957)
  3. United States v. McGee144 F. Supp. 466 (N.D. Ind. 1956)
  4. Sol Kaye v. United States235 F.2d 187 (6th Cir. 1956)
  5. In re Wood123 F. Supp. 297 (W.D. Ky. 1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list