TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Eberle v. Somonek

Eberle v. Somonek, 99 A.2d 377 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1953)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 23, 1953
Judges
Judges Eastwood, Jayne and Francis
Citations
99 A.2d 37727 N.J. Super. 2791953 N.J. Super. LEXIS 707

Opinion

27 N.J. Super. 279 (1953) 99 A.2d 377

MARY ANN EBERLE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

JOSEPH SOMONEK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 21, 1953. Decided September 23, 1953.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. John VR. Strong argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Strong & Strong, attorneys).

Mr. Baruch S. Seidman argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Burton & Seidman, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ewart reported in 24 N.J. Super. 366 ( Ch. 1953).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Eberle v. Somonek, 94 A.2d 535 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1953) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list