TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State in Interest of RW

State in Interest of RW, 293 A.2d 186 (N.J. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 7, 1972
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
293 A.2d 18661 N.J. 118

Opinion — Per Curiam

61 N.J. 118 (1972) 293 A.2d 186

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, IN THE INTEREST OF R.W., A JUVENILE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued June 5, 1972. Decided July 7, 1972.

Mr. Stephen Apollo, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for defendant-appellant ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Stephen Apollo, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the brief, and Mr. Edward Nussbaum, Legal Assistant, on the brief).

Mr. John P. Goceljak, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent ( Mr. Joseph D.J. Gourley, Passaic County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. John P. Goceljak, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN. — 7.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. R. W., 293 A.2d 186 (N.J. 1972) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list