Guy Edmond Weir v. Jerome J. Gordon
Guy Edmond WEIR, Appellant, v. Jerome J. GORDON, Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
In this action for copyright infringement the district court, 111 F.Supp. 117 , found that the appellant made copies of the principal features of the appellee’s copyrighted advertising material, and caused the same to be published for his own profit. We find that the district court’s controlling findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and that the court correctly applied the law. Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co., 8 Cir., 1932, 61 F.2d 131 . It follows that the judgment of the district court should be and it hereby is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(operating methods of plaintiff examined to justify finding of only one infringement for several publications)
Cited by 16 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. And Sid & Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc. - Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc
- Davis v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Company
- Baccaro v. Pisa
- Raffoler, Ltd. v. Peabody & Wright, Ltd.
- Lin-Brook Builders Hardware v. Evelyn Gertler and Irving Gertler, Individually, and Dba All-American Home Center
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc., and Henry Glass & Co. v. Jobela Fabrics, Inc.
Most recent
- Raffoler, Ltd. v. Peabody & Wright, Ltd.
- United Features Syndicate, Inc. v. Spree, Inc.
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Sony Corp. of America
- Plymouth Music Co. v. Magnus Organ Corp.
- Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. And Sid & Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc. - Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc
- Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. v. McDonald'S Corp.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.