TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

The G. & P. Amusement Company v. Regent Theater Company

The G. & P. AMUSEMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. REGENT THEATER COMPANY, Et Al., Appellees

The G. & P. Amusement Co. v. Regent Theater Co., 216 F.2d 749 (6th Cir. 1954)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 16, 1954
Docket
No. 12068
Judges
Allen, Martin, Miller, Per Curiam
Citations
216 F.2d 7491954 U.S. App. LEXIS 46501954 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,888

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The District Court dismissed the amended and supplemental complaint of appellant and entered judgment for appellees in this action for treble damages brought by appellant against the appellee motion picture distributors and exhibitors for alleged violation of sections 1, 2 and 7 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§15 and 26.

We have thoughtfully considered the arguments advanced, the record in the case, the comprehensive and logically reasoned opinion of District Judge Freed, 107 F.Supp. 453 , together with his eighty-seven findings of fact, which are supported by substantial evidence and certainly are not clearly erroneous, and his seven conclusions of law, sustained by highest authority. Upon the *750 basis of his opinion, findings and conelusions, we are of opinion that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed, and that no worthwhile contribution would be made by this court by attempting to re-write in our own words the excellent opinion of the District Judge, who gave most conscientious study to the problems presented and has stated accurate conclusions, The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1955: 11957: 21959: 11964: 31974: 11977: 119552026peak 1964 · 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
G. & P. Amusement Co. v. Regent Theater Co., 107 F. Supp. 453 (N.D. Ohio 1952) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list