Vesley v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance
Dennis D. Vesley, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company, a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendant-Respondent, and Samuel A. Gennet, an Individual, Defendant
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The members of the Court being equally divided, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed. 189 N.J.Super.
521 .
No costs to either party.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD and O’HERN — 3.
For reversal — Justice HANDLER — 1.
For reversal and remandment — Justices POLLOCK and GARIBALDI — 2.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(action on a builder's risk policy for loss incurred by vandalism no counsel fees)
Cited by 15 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.