Application of George H. Gibson

Application of George H. Gibson, 218 F.2d 320 (9th Cir. 1955)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: February 28, 1955
Docket: No. 402_1
Judges: Denman, Bone, Orr
Citations: 218 F.2d 320

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Gibson sought to file an application in forma pauperis for a writ of habeas corpus with the District Court for the District of Oregon. Permission was denied. He now seeks leave from this court to appeal forma pauperis. His application was not verified as is required by 28 U.S. C. § 2242, and the District Court was justified in refusing to file it.

Permission to appeal forma pauperis is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 2 cases

View all citing references →

U.S. Courts of Appeals2

Relies on it most ⓘ

Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden Attorney General of the State of California908 F.2d 490 (9th Cir. 1990)
William Nicholas Karcher v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Florida Division of Corrections476 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1973)

Most recent

Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden Attorney General of the State of California908 F.2d 490 (9th Cir. 1990)
William Nicholas Karcher v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Florida Division of Corrections476 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1973)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list