Wilson v. LeGrice
Franklin Wilson and Walter Bamford D.B.A. B & W Sand & Gravel Co. v. James LeGrice
Opinion
Per curiam.
This is an action on the case to recover the balance claimed due for labor and materials furnished under an oral contract between the parties. A trial by the court resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs for $600. The defendant's exceptions were reserved and transferred by Keller, C.J.
*486 The plaintiff Wilson testified that he agreed to install two separate septic tank systems with leach fields and fills for the service of the defendant’s apartments, at a price of $2400, and that he fulfilled this contract. It is undisputed that he has been paid $1800. The defendant claimed that the plaintiffs also agreed to make connections between the apartments and the tanks. This the plaintiffs denied.
The contradictions between the parties, who were the only witnesses, were severe, but as we have repeatedly held, such conflicts were for the trial court to resolve.
Clover &c. Co. v. Smith Co., 96 N.H. 491 , 79 A.2d 8 (1951);
Streeter v. New England Box Co., 106 N.H. 146, 148 , 207 A.2d 423, 424 (1965). An examination of the entire record discloses no errors and that the evidence supports the verdict.
Judgment on the verdict.
All concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.