Crescent Lumber & Shingle Company v. J. C. Rotherum
Crescent Lumber & Shingle Company v. J. C. Rotherum and R. W. Anders, Jointly and Severally, as Individuals and as Partners in the Firm of J. C. Rotherum Lumber Company, a Partnership
Opinion
218 F.2d 638
CRESCENT LUMBER & SHINGLE COMPANY, Appellant, v. J. C. ROTHERUM and R. W. Anders, jointly and severally, as individuals and as partners in the firm of J. C. Rotherum Lumber Company, a partnership, Appellees.
No. 14994.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 25, 1955.
Wm. Madden Hill, Dallas, Tex., Ungerman, Hill & Ungerman, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, HOLMES, Circuit Judge, and ALLRED, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
1
Appellant, a Washington corporation, sued defendants, resident citizens of Texas, upon a sworn account 1 for materials (lumber) furnished in the amount of $2,767.45, and $500 alleged to be reasonable attorney's fees. The trial court dismissed the complaint for want of jurisdiction, on the theory that the attorney's fees were not recoverable, and therefore the amount in controversy did not exceed $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs. This was error.
2
Article 2226, Vernon's Civil Statutes, as amended Acts 1953, 53rd Leg., p. 101, ch. 67, § 1, clearly provides for recovery of reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to the claim and costs, on valid claims for, among other things, materials furnished, or suits founded upon a sworn account or accounts. 2 This right to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to the claim and costs, is a liability properly enforceable in a federal court, to be included in determining the amount in controversy. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Jones, 290 U.S. 199 , 54 S.Ct. 133 , 78 L.Ed. 267 .
3
Reversed.
1
Under Rule 185, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, formerly Art. 3736, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes 2
As originally enacted the amount of attorney's fees was limited to $20 but this limitation was removed by amendment in 1949. The 1953 amendment added 'or suits founded upon a sworn account or accounts.'
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Peacock & Peacock, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Insurance Company
- DeLorenzo v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
- A. E. Stokes and Estelle Stokes v. James H. Reeves and Isham P. Nelson, Jr., Doing Business as Reeves and Nelson
- Corrosion Rectifying Co. v. Freeport Sulphur Co.
- Cupples Company Manufacturers v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank
- Brown v. Haldale Estates, Inc.
Most recent
- Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. v. DC Farms, LLC
- Cupples Company Manufacturers v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank
- DeLorenzo v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
- Peacock & Peacock, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Insurance Company
- Corrosion Rectifying Co. v. Freeport Sulphur Co.
- A. E. Stokes and Estelle Stokes v. James H. Reeves and Isham P. Nelson, Jr., Doing Business as Reeves and Nelson
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.