TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Great Lakes Steel Corporation v. United States

Great Lakes Steel Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. United States of America, Interstate Commerce Commission, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Erie Railroad Company, and the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Intervening

Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. United States, 220 F.2d 751 (6th Cir. 1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 12, 1955
Docket
No. 12189_1
Citations
220 F.2d 7511955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4924

Opinion

220 F.2d 751

GREAT LAKES STEEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, Interstate Commerce Commission, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Erie Railroad Company, and the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Intervening Appellees.

No. 12189.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 12, 1955.

Hill, Essery, Lewis & Andrews, James McEvoy, Jr., and Harry D. Fenske, Detroit, Mich. (argued by Edward T. Goodrich, Detroit, Mich.), for appellant.

Herbert Brownell, Jr., Atty. Gen., Fred W. Kaess, Detroit, Mich., E. M. Reidy, I.C.C., Washington, D.C., Willis T. Pierson, Cleveland, Ohio, E. A. Kaier, Philadelphia, Pa., Frank H. Cole, Jr., Cincinnanti, Ohio, and Dyer, Angell & Meek, Detroit, Mich. (argued by Ellis v. Gregory, Washington, D.C., for Interstate Comm. Comn. and by Frank H. Cole, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, for Railroads) for appellees.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel;

2

And it appearing that the District Court afforded argument and reargument upon the case and carefully considered the record as a whole;

3

And it appearing that upon the record considered as a whole substantial evidence exists supporting the order of the Commission;

4

And it appearing that the District Court properly applied the applicable law. Cf. Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 :

5

It Is Ordered that the judgment of the District Court, 115 F.Supp. 31 , be and it hereby is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1962: 11963: 119622026peak 1962 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 474 (1951) 7,362
Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. United States, 115 F. Supp. 31 (E.D. Mich. 1953) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list