TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

James A. Williams v. United States

Williams v. United States, 221 F.2d 236 (9th Cir. 1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 7, 1955
Docket
No. 428
Citations
221 F.2d 23615 Alaska 5021955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3501

Opinion

221 F.2d 236

James A. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

Misc. No. 428.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 7, 1955.

James A. Williams, in pro. per.

No appearance for respondent.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This court on February 10, 1955, dismissed a petition by movant to review an order of the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, entered December 9, 1954, denying his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because no notice of appeal had been filed. The filing of notice of appeal on February 17, 1955, comes too late, and the motion is dismissed.

2

Movant also seeks to combine three cases identified as Criminal Numbers 1841, 1842 and 1843 for review. Notices of appeal in these cases were filed more than a year ago but the records have never been docketed in this court. These appeals are dismissed. Rule 39, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1956: 11959: 119562026peak 1956 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. James A. Williams v. United States236 F.2d 894 (9th Cir. 1956)
  2. James A. Williams v. Pierce County Board of Commissioners267 F.2d 866 (9th Cir. 1959)

Most recent

  1. James A. Williams v. Pierce County Board of Commissioners267 F.2d 866 (9th Cir. 1959)
  2. James A. Williams v. United States236 F.2d 894 (9th Cir. 1956)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list