TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rousseff v. Western Airlines, Inc.

Christ M. ROUSSEFF, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant

Rousseff v. Western Airlines, Inc., 409 F. Supp. 1262 (C.D. Cal. 1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, C.D. California · Federal District Courts
Decided
March 22, 1976
Docket
No. CV 74-2552-AAH
Judges
Hauk
Citations
409 F. Supp. 12621976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15993

Opinion — Hauk

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW HAUK, District Judge.

Defendant, Western Airlines, Inc., herein presents its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

FINDINGS OF FACT I. On October 26, 1973, plaintiff boarded WESTERN AIRLINES Flight No. 216 at Los Angeles, and said flight was scheduled to arrive at Phoenix at 4:59 P.M., with an intermediate stop at San Diego.

2. When Flight No. 216 arrived in San Diego, plaintiff was requested to disembark and was treated as being a stand-by passenger on the flight from San Diego to Phoenix.

3. Plaintiff was not given a confirmed seat for the San Diego to Phoenix flight.

4. Defendant WESTERN rerouted plaintiff from San Diego back to Los Angeles on Delta Airlines Flight No. 864, and from Los Angeles to Phoenix on WESTERN AIRLINES Flight 724.

5. WESTERN Flight No. 724 was scheduled to arrive in Phoenix at 6:40 P.M., less than two hours from the scheduled arrival time of Flight No. 216.

6. Plaintiff accepted and used the rerouted ticket provided by defendant WESTERN.

7. Plaintiff has no remedy at law, because he was provided with alternative transportation which would have gotten him to his destination within less than two hours from his originally scheduled time of arrival.

8. Under C.F.R., Part 250, specifically §§ 250.6 and 250.7, plaintiff’s acceptance and use of the rerouted tickets provided by WESTERN constituted liquidated damages for all damages suffered by plaintiff, and plaintiff is therefore barred from this action.

9. Plaintiff can present no substantial evidence that he is entitled to any relief for either negligent or intentional infliction of emotional harm under California State law.

10. Plaintiff can present no facts to support a claim for any unjust discrimination or any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever under 49 U.S.C. § 1374 (b).

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Plaintiff has no remedy at law, because he was provided with alternative transportation which would have gotten him to his destination within less than two hours from his originally scheduled time of arrival.

2. Under 14 C.F.R., Part 250, specifically §§ 250.6 and 250.7, plaintiff’s acceptance and use of the rerouted tickets provided by WESTERN constituted liquid damages for all damages suffered by plaintiff, and plaintiff is therefore barred from this action.

3. Plaintiff can present no substantial evidence that he is entitled to any relief for either negligent or intentional infliction of emotional harm under California State law.

4. Plaintiff can present no facts to support a claim for any unjust dis *1264 crimination or any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage in any respect whatsoever under 49 U.S.C. § 1374 (b).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1978: 11980: 319782026peak 1980 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wasserman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.486 F. Supp. 194 (W.D. Mo. 1980)
  2. Gary Wasserman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., a New York Corporation632 F.2d 69 (8th Cir. 1980)
  3. Edna Christensen v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.633 F.2d 529 (9th Cir. 1980)
  4. Christensen v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.455 F. Supp. 492 (D. Haw. 1978)

Most recent

  1. Edna Christensen v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.633 F.2d 529 (9th Cir. 1980)
  2. Gary Wasserman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., a New York Corporation632 F.2d 69 (8th Cir. 1980)
  3. Wasserman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.486 F. Supp. 194 (W.D. Mo. 1980)
  4. Christensen v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.455 F. Supp. 492 (D. Haw. 1978)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list