TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hershel California Fruit Products Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Hunt Foods, Inc., a Corporation

HERSHEL CALIFORNIA FRUIT PRODUCTS COMPANY, Inc., a Corporation, Et Al., Appellants, v. HUNT FOODS, Inc., a Corporation, Appellee

Hershel Cal. Fruit Prods. Co. v. Hunt Foods, Inc., 221 F.2d 797 (9th Cir. 1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 22, 1955
Docket
No. 13905_1
Judges
Chambers, Denman, Orr, Per Curiam
Citations
221 F.2d 797

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has moved to dismiss its appeal from an order of the District Court denying it a preliminary injunction. Ill F.Supp. 732. The ground for dismissal is alleged to be that the motion for a preliminary injunction has become moot. Appellee resists dismissal, contending that this court should retain the appeal and affirm the order of the District Court with directions to dismiss the action. We think the ends of justice would be best served by dismissing the appeal and permitting the trial court to hear and determine the case on the merits.

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 119572026peak 1957 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list