TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Peabody Coal Company v. Powell

PEABODY COAL COMPANY, Appellant, v. Marshall POWELL Et Al., Appellees

Peabody Coal Co. v. Powell, 351 S.W.2d 172 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 16, 1961
Judges
Williams
Citations
351 S.W.2d 1721961 Ky. LEXIS 148

Opinion — Williams

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Harlan Circuit Court affirming an award of the Kentucky Workmen’s Compensation Board allowing permanent and total disability benefits to appellee Marshall Powell as a result of silicosis. The appellee had worked for appellant Peabody Coal Company for many years until February 1958. Prior to that date appellee had complained of chest pains and shortness of breath. In October 1957 his trouble had been diagnosed as pulmonary fibrosis with pulmonary emphysema. The doctor who made that diagnosis did not advise appellee what was wrong with him at that time. On February 5, 1959, the appellee was examined *173 by Dr. Boyce E. Jones, who diagnosed silicosis. About two weeks later, on February 20, he filed his application before the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The Board held as a fact that the appellee learned for the first time that he had silicosis when examined by Dr. Jones on February 5, 1959.

The sole issue in the case is notice. We have on this date decided in Mary Helen Coal Corporation v. Chitwood et al., Ky., 351 S.W.2d 167 , that before notice is required to be given by the employee the following conditions must concur: (1) The employee has a disability from an occupational disease which impairs his capacity to perform his work; and (2) the employee knows or should know by the exercise of reasonable care and diligence that he is suffering from the disease.

The employee first learned he had silicosis on February 5, 1959, and filed his claim with- the Workmen’s Compensation Board approximately two weeks later. The filing of his claim within that time was sufficient notice to appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1962: 21963: 11964: 11987: 11996: 12000: 12001: 12008: 119622026peak 1962 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stephens Elkhorn Coal Company v. Tibbs374 S.W.2d 504 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963)
  2. Gregory v. Peabody Coal Company355 S.W.2d 156 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962)
  3. Hill v. Sextet Mining Corp.65 S.W.3d 503 (Ky. 2001)
  4. Smith v. Cardinal Construction Co.13 S.W.3d 623 (Ky. 2000)
  5. Trico County Development & Pipeline v. Smith289 S.W.3d 538 (Ky. 2008)
  6. Cutshin Coal Co. v. Begley385 S.W.2d 59 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964)

Most recent

  1. Trico County Development & Pipeline v. Smith289 S.W.3d 538 (Ky. 2008)
  2. Hill v. Sextet Mining Corp.65 S.W.3d 503 (Ky. 2001)
  3. Smith v. Cardinal Construction Co.13 S.W.3d 623 (Ky. 2000)
  4. Martin County Coal Corp. v. Preece924 S.W.2d 840 (Ky. Ct. App. 1996)
  5. Moon v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.736 S.W.2d 92 (Tenn. 1987)
  6. Cutshin Coal Co. v. Begley385 S.W.2d 59 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Mary Helen Coal Corp. v. Chitwood, 351 S.W.2d 167 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961) 28

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list