TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

John W. Jackson, Administrator D.B.N., C.T.A. Of the Estate of Bertha M. Roberts, Deceased v. Glens Falls Indemnity Company

John W. JACKSON, Administrator D.B.N., C.T.A. of the Estate of Bertha M. Roberts, Deceased, Appellant, v. GLENS FALLS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee

Jackson v. Glens Falls Indem. Co., 222 F.2d 807 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 25, 1955
Docket
No. 12514
Judges
Edgerton, Fahy, Miller, Per Curiam, Wilbur
Citations
222 F.2d 807

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

An executor misappropriated funds. The question is whether his surety, the appellee, is liable to the estate, now represented by the appellant administrator, for interest on the amounts in default from the dates of the defaults, or as the District Court held, only from the time when payment of those amounts was demanded from appellee.

In United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 236 U.S. 512, 529 , 35 S.Ct. 298, 303 , 59 L.Ed. 696 , “the actual damages exceed [ed] the amount of the penalty” named in the surety bond. Cf. Cunningham v. Cunningham, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 157 F.2d 859 . Here, the penalty named in the bond exceeded the damages. But the *808 Fidelity rule, that interest does not run against a surety until demand is made upon him, has been extended to cases in which, as in the present case, “the penalty of the bond is ample to meet in full the claims of all.” Royal Indemnity Co. v. Woodbury Granite Co., 69 App.D.C. 364, 368, 369 , 101 F.2d 689, 693, 694 . London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. Smoot, 52 App.D.C. 378 , 287 F. 952 .

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1992: 119922026peak 1992 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 236 U.S. 512 (1915) 168
Royal Indem. Co. v. Woodbury Granite Co., 101 F.2d 689 (D.C. Cir. 1938) 18
London & Lancashire Indem. Co. of Am. v. Smoot, 287 F. 952 (D.C. Cir. 1923) 17
Cunningham v. Cunningham, 157 F.2d 859 (D.C. Cir. 1946) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list