TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Buhl Land Company v. Thomas G. Kavanagh, Administrator of Estate of Giles Kavanagh, Deceased, Collector of Internal Revenue at Detroit, Michigan

BUHL LAND COMPANY, Appellant, v. Thomas G. KAVANAGH, Administrator of Estate of Giles Kavanagh, Deceased, Collector of Internal Revenue at Detroit, Michigan, Appellee

Buhl Land Co. v. Kavanagh, 223 F.2d 265 (6th Cir. 1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 27, 1955
Docket
No. 12341_1
Judges
Allen, McALLISTER, Per Curiam, Stewart
Citations
223 F.2d 26547 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 12481955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4295

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the district court’s judgment in appellant’s suit for refund of income taxes alleged to have been erroneously assessed and collected for the years 1939 to 1943, inclusive.

Appellant is an accrual basis taxpayer. At issue are: (1) appellant’s right as lessor to accrue unpaid rentals for the balance of a ten-year lease after a Conservator-Receiver appointed for the lessee national bank had repudiated the lease and appellant had re-entered the premises; (2) appellant’s right as depositor to accrue interest on its impounded deposit in a national b'ank in the years 1933 to 1940, when it was unknown whether any interest would be paid; and (3) whether or not appellant’s claim for refund of 1939 income taxes and interest was filed within the time permitted by the statute. Other questions, including a claimed bad debt deduction for 1939 and the right to net operating loss carryovers in 1940 and 1941, depend upon decision of the basic issues stated.

The district court concluded that the appellant could not accrue the above-described rental and interest income, and that appellant’s refund claim for 1939 was barred by the statute of limitations. Judge Koscinski’s discussion of the issues, accompanying his complete findings of fact and conclusions of law, is thorough, clear,' and correctly reasoned.

For the reasons therein stated, it is ordered that the judgment of the district court, 131 F.Supp. 136 , be and it hereby is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 11985: 119772026peak 1977 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Buhl Land Co. v. Kavanagh, 131 F. Supp. 136 (E.D. Mich. 1954) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list