TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Blackman v. Langford

Terry Lee BLACKMAN, Julie Barnes Webb, and Claudia Webb Blackman, Petitioners, v. Alice Foxworth LANGFORD and Mark Edward Langford, Sr., Individually, and as Parents of Their Deceased Child, Robert Benjamin Langford, Respondents

Blackman v. Langford, 795 S.W.2d 742 (Tex. 1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 19, 1990
Docket
No. D-0130
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
795 S.W.2d 74233 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 7511990 Tex. LEXIS 1171990 WL 134754

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This cause once more presents the issue of whether a wrongful death and survival action can be brought when a viable fetus is subsequently stillborn. Tex.Rev.Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. §§ 71.002 & 71.021 (Vernon 1986). The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that the wrongful death and survival statutes do not permit a cause of action for the death of a fetus. The court of appeals construed the statutes as allowing a cause of action and therefore reversed the trial court’s judgment and remanded the cause for trial. 790 S.W.2d 127 (1990). We have held that “no cause of action may be maintained for the death of a fetus under the wrongful death statute until the right to bring such action is afforded by the legislature.”

Witty v. American Gen. Capital Distrib., 727 S.W.2d 503, 506 (Tex.1987);

Tarrant County Dist. Hosp. v. Lobdell, 726 S.W.2d 23 (Tex.1987) (per curiam).

The judgment of the court of appeals conflicts with prior decisions of this Court. Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 170, we grant petitioners’ application for writ of error and without hearing oral argument a majority of the Court reverses the judgment of the court of appeals and affirms the judgment of the trial court.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 21 cases

View all citing references →
1992: 11993: 11994: 11995: 41997: 11998: 11999: 12000: 52001: 22002: 22004: 219922026peak 2000 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Krishnan v. Sepulveda916 S.W.2d 478 (Tex. 1995)
  2. Sosebee v. Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center8 S.W.3d 427 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000)
  3. Gross v. Davies882 S.W.2d 452 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994)
  4. Parvin v. Dean7 S.W.3d 264 (Tex. App. 1999)
  5. Fort Worth Osteopathic Hospital, Inc. v. Reese148 S.W.3d 94 (Tex. 2004)
  6. Edinburg Hospital Authority v. Treviño941 S.W.2d 76 (Tex. 1997)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Witty v. Am. Gen. Capital Distributors, Inc., 727 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. 1987) 70
Tarrant Cnty. Hosp. Dist. v. Norma, 726 S.W.2d 23 (Tex. 1987) 10
Langford v. Blackman, 790 S.W.2d 127 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1990) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list