TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

George A. Landell, of E. A. Landell, Deceased, Etc. v. Northern Pacific Railway Company

George A. LANDELL, Executor of E. A. Landell, Deceased, Et Al., Etc., Appellants, v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee

Landell v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., 223 F.2d 316 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 14, 1955
Docket
No. 12428_1
Judges
Bastian, Bazelon, Per Curiam, Prettyman
Citations
223 F.2d 31696 U.S. App. D.C. 241955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3958

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, acting as a committee of minority stockholders of the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, a federal corporation organized and existing under an act of Congress of July 2, 1864, 1

brought this civil action. The gravamen of the complaint was that a reorganization of the railroad in 1896 was illegal. Appellants said they had protested the reorganization continuously since that date. However that may be, they did not seek judicial remedy until they brought the present action in 1950.

2

In the District Court Judge Tamm, with a careful and exhaustive opinion, 3

concluded that the action was barred by laches.

We agree and have nothing to add to his discussion of the matter.

Affirmed.

1

. 13 Stat. 365 .

2

. A suit was brought in the Southern District of New York in 1900 by one Hoover, not of appellants’ committee. It was allowed to die for want of prosecution in 1939, and a motion to reinstate it was denied for inexcusable laches.

3

. Landell v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., 122 F.Supp. 253 (D.C.D.C.1954).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →
1956: 11960: 11966: 11968: 11969: 21970: 21971: 11972: 11974: 21976: 21981: 119562026peak 1969 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Moore v. State553 P.2d 8 (Alaska 1976)
  2. Hicks v. Weaver302 F. Supp. 619 (E.D. La. 1969)
  3. Amidon v. Amidon280 A.2d 82 (D.C. 1971)
  4. United States v. United States296 F. Supp. 853 (D.D.C. 1969)
  5. Baskin v. Tennessee Valley Authority382 F. Supp. 641 (M.D. Tenn. 1974)
  6. United States v. United States296 F. Supp. 853 (D.D.C. 1968)

Most recent

  1. Mogul v. Tucker430 N.E.2d 87 (Ill. App. Ct. 1981)
  2. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Federal Home Loan Bank421 F. Supp. 384 (S.D. Ohio 1976)
  3. Moore v. State553 P.2d 8 (Alaska 1976)
  4. Baskin v. Tennessee Valley Authority382 F. Supp. 641 (M.D. Tenn. 1974)
  5. Adair v. Nashville Housing Authority388 F. Supp. 481 (M.D. Tenn. 1974)
  6. George v. Hillman Transportation Company340 F. Supp. 296 (W.D. Pa. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Landell v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., 122 F. Supp. 253 (D.D.C. 1954) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list