Ex Parte Higginbotham
Ex Parte William T. HIGGINBOTHAM
Opinion
WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.
This is an original application for writ of habeas corpus by which the petitioner seeks his release from the penitentiary on the ground that he was not represented by counsel when he waived a jury and pleaded guilty before the court *928 On January 30, 1964 the petitioner entered his plea of guilty in Cause No. 686S6 before the Criminal District Court of Tarrant County to the offense of robbery and waived a trial by jury. There being no showing that the defendant was indigent, no attorney was appointed to represent him.
Art. 10a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., provides that before a defendant who has no attorney can agree to waive a jury, the court must appoint an attorney to represent him. This provision is mandatory and applies whether the defendant is indigent or not. Failure to comply renders the conviction void. Ex parte Rawlins, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 346 , 255 S.W.2d 877 ; Ex parte Ross, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 246 , 305 S.W.2d 958 .
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted; the petitioner is ordered released from the penitentiary and delivered to the custody of the Sheriff of Tarrant County, Texas, to answer the indictment in Cause No. 68656 in the Criminal District Court of Tarrant County.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.