TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Butler v. Emerson

Terrance Butler, Director of Mental Retardation Services, Bradford, Sullivan, Tioga Counties Et Al., Appellants v. Maude Lynn Emerson, an Incompetent, by Geraldine Emerson, Her Guardian, Appellee

Butler v. Emerson, 463 A.2d 109 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · State Appellate Courts
Decided
August 4, 1983
Docket
Nos. , 1734 C.D. 1981
Judges
Crumlish, Dotl, MacPhail
Citations
463 A.2d 10976 Pa. Commw. 1561983 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1825

Opinion — Crumlish

Opinion by President Judge Crumlish, Jr., This is an appeal 1

from a Bradford County Common Pleas Court order granting partial peremptory judgment in a mandamus action. We quash the appeal.

Peremptory judgment was entered January 7,1981. The trial court dismissed the appellants’ exceptions on June 11, 1981, and an appeal was taken to this Court. However, the docket does not show that a motion to open judgment has ever been filed and ruled upon by the trial court.

Regarding the entering of peremptory judgment in mandamus, Pa. R.C.P. No. 1098 provides in part:

*158 At any time after the filing of the complaint, the court may enter judgment if the right of the plaintiff thereto is clear, but the judgment may be opened upon cause shown.

The rule has been construed to require appellants to proceed by filing a petition to open judgment rather than appealing the entering of the judgment.

Hamby v. Stoe, 448 Pa. 483 , 295 A.2d 309 (1972);

Mertz v. Lakotas, 21 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 591 , 347 A.2d 753 (1975). Consequently, this appeal is premature.

Appeal quashed.

Order The appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bradford County, No. 78-1914 Civil Action — Law, dated January 7, 1981, is hereby quashed.

1

The appellants are the director and administrator of the mental health/mental retardation program for Bradford, Sullivan and Tioga Counties.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1987: 11988: 11991: 12015: 119872026peak 1987 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Borough Council v. Bargaining Committee531 A.2d 565 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987)
  2. Commonwealth v. Buffalo Tavern, Inc.544 A.2d 1125 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988)
  3. Parents Against Abuse in Schools v. Williamsport Area School District594 A.2d 796 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991)
  4. In re Order Amending Rule 311, 341, and 904 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate ProcedureNo. 258 Appellate Procedural Rules Docket (Pa. Dec. 14, 2015)

Most recent

  1. In re Order Amending Rule 311, 341, and 904 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate ProcedureNo. 258 Appellate Procedural Rules Docket (Pa. Dec. 14, 2015)
  2. Parents Against Abuse in Schools v. Williamsport Area School District594 A.2d 796 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1991)
  3. Commonwealth v. Buffalo Tavern, Inc.544 A.2d 1125 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1988)
  4. Borough Council v. Bargaining Committee531 A.2d 565 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Hamby v. Stoe, 295 A.2d 309 (Pa. 1972) 16
Mertz v. Lakatos, 347 A.2d 753 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1975) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list