Gianni Santi v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State
Gianni SANTI, Appellant, v. John Foster DULLES, Secretary of State, Appellee
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The judgment in this case is reversed and the case is remanded upon the authority of Soccodato v. Dulles. 1
Reversed and remanded.
. 96 U.S.App.D.C. -, 226 F.2d 243 (D.C.Cir., 1955).
Concurrence
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge,
concurs in this result solely because of the ruling issued by the court in Soccodato v. Dulles.
Dissent
BASTIAN, Circuit Judge,
dissents for the reasons stated by him in De Marco v. Dulles, 96 U.S.App.D.C. -, 226 F.2d 265 .
Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document
226 F.2d 266 96 U.S.App.D.C. 364
Gianni SANTI, Appellant, v. John Foster DULLES, Secretary of State, Appellee.
No. 12241.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 25, 1955. Decided July 7, 1955. Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied Oct. 4, 1955.
Mr. Joseph Forer, with whom Mr. David Rein, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. Harold H. Greene, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Mr. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., and Messrs. Lewis Carroll and William F. Becker, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before PRETTYMAN, BAZELON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
The judgment in this case is reversed and the case is remanded upon the authority of Soccodato v. Dulles. 1 2
Reversed and remanded.
3
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge, concurs in this result solely because of the ruling issued by the court in Soccodato v. Dulles.
4
BASTIAN, Circuit Judge, dissents for the reasons stated by him in De Marco v. Dulles, 96 U.S.App.D.C. , 226 F.2d 265 .
1
96 U.S.App.D.C. , 226 F.2d 243 (D.C.Cir., 1955)
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.