J. H. M. Realty Corp. v. Town of Belleville
J. H. M. Realty Corp., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey, and Work-O-Lite, a Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the Town of Belleville, Defendant-Respondent
Opinion
Per Curiam.
Certification was granted in this matter, 60 N. J.
471 (1972), and also in Brooks v. City of Orange, 60 N. J.
514 (1972), also decided this day, 61 N. J.
576, to permit consideration of the doctrine of Reimann v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co., 9 N. J.
134 (1952), and Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co., 27
91 (1958). We are not persuaded to depart from those decisions and hence the judgment herein is affirmed.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, Justices Hall and Mountain, and Judges Conford, Sullivan and Lewis —6.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(3 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned)
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.