TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Simon Lipschutz, Individually and Trading as McCall Curtain and Linen Shop, Bankrupt. Solomon Lichstein and Clara Lichstein, His Wife

Matter of Simon LIPSCHUTZ, Individually and Trading as McCall’s Curtain and Linen Shop, Bankrupt. Solomon Lichstein and Clara Lichstein, His Wife, Appellants

In re Simon Lipschutz, Individually & Trading as McCall Curtain & Linen Shop, Bankrupt. Solomon Lichstein & Clara Lichstein, His Wife, 228 F.2d 290 (3d Cir. 1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 8, 1955
Docket
No. 11649_1
Judges
Biggs, Ka-Lodner, Hastie
Citations
228 F.2d 2901955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4394

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

On the present record this case was decided correctly by the Referee and the court below. Appellant lessor filed a reclamation petition for an air-conditioner installed on the premises by a prior lessee and sold by that lessee to the bankrupt. The petition was dismissed. The law of Pennsylvania governs the rights of the lessor and the lessee. The term “fixtures” employed in the form 50 lease must be interpreted according to that law. Under the law of Pennsylvania “trade fixtures,” belonging to the lessee, as distinguished from “fixtures,” may not be seized by the lessor unless it be shown that it was the clear intent of the parties. All the evidence points in the other direction here. See 339-41 Market St. Corp. v. Darling Stores Corp., 1946, 355 Pa. 312 , 49 A.2d 686 and Lindsay Brothers, Inc., v. Curtis Publishing Co., 1912, 236 Pa. 229, 232 , 84 A. 783 , 42 L.R.A.,N.S„ 546. Cf. Isman v. Hanscom, 1907, 217 Pa. 133 , 66 A. 329 .

Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 11972: 11989: 119662026peak 1966 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Isman v. Hanscom, 66 A. 329 (Pa. 1907) 19
Lindsay Bros. v. Curtis Publ'g Co., 84 A. 783 (Pa. 1912) 17
339-41 Mkt. St. Corp. v. Darling Stores Corp., 49 A.2d 686 (Pa. 1946) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list