Apollo v. Kim Anh Pham
Opinion
224 N.J. Super. 89 (1987) 539 A.2d 1222
BENJAMIN APOLLO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
KIM ANH PHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 1, 1987. Decided December 11, 1987.
Before Judges DEIGHAN, HAVEY and MUIR.
Edward J. Bowen argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent ( Edward J. Bowen on the brief).
Robert C. Rivas argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant ( Bergen County Legal Services, attorneys; Robert C. Rivas on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Chancery Division denying a trial by jury is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Sorkow in his opinion reported at 192 N.J. Super. 427 (Ch.Div. 1983).
(The balance of the opinion which disposes of essentially factual issues in the same case decided by another judge is omitted from this publication.)
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(claim for support in palimony action is not triable by a jury)
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.