TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Philadelphia Dress Joint Board v. Jesse J. Rosinsky

Philadelphia Dress Joint Board, an Unincorporated Association by William Ross, Trustee Ad Litem, Affiliated With the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Jesse J. Rosinsky, Individually and Trading as H. H. Rosinsky & Company

Philadelphia Dress Joint Bd. v. Rosinsky, 229 F.2d 438 (3d Cir. 1956)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 19, 1956
Docket
No. 11717
Citations
229 F.2d 4381956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4460

Opinion

229 F.2d 438

PHILADELPHIA DRESS JOINT BOARD, an Unincorporated Association by William Ross, Trustee Ad Litem, Affiliated with the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, v. Jesse J. ROSINSKY, Individually and Trading as H. H. Rosinsky & Company, Appellant.

No. 11717.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued January 12, 1956.

Decided January 19, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; John W. Lord, Judge.

James L. Price, Philadelphia, Pa., (Richman, Price & Jamieson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

M. Herbert Syme, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before MARIS, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This was a suit under section 9 of title 9, United States Code, to enforce an award rendered in an arbitration proceeding between the parties. The defendant's motion to dismiss the action was properly denied by the district court upon the authority of Tenney Engineering, Inc., v. United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers of America, 3 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 450 . Subsequently the district court entered judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant appeals. We have examined the defendant's contentions raised on this appeal and find them to be without merit. They are fully discussed in the opinion of the district court filed by Judge Lord, 134 F.Supp. 607 , and we are in agreement with what is there said. No further discussion of them here is necessary.

2

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Tenney Eng'g, Inc. v. United Elec. Radio & MacHine Workers of Am., (u.e.) Local 437, 207 F.2d 450 (3d Cir. 1953) 110
Philadelphia Dress Joint Bd. v. Rosinsky, 134 F. Supp. 607 (E.D. Pa. 1955) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list