Doxzen v. Director
Opinion
236 Md. 657 (1964) 205 A.2d 238
DOXZEN
v.
DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION [App. No. 69, September Term, 1964.]
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided December 7, 1964.
Before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY, MARBURY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.
PER CURIAM:
In this application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief, the applicant, an inmate of Patuxent Institution, seeks to attack the jurisdictional basis of his commitment thereto, on the ground that his criminal sentence had expired at the time of the determination that he was a defective delinquent, as he may under Simon v. Director, 235 Md. 626 . But there is no merit in the point. Eggleston v. State, 209 Md. 504, 511 ; Roberts v. Director, 226 Md. 643, 651 ; Bullock v. Director, 231 Md. 629, 631 . Cf. Code (1964 Supp.), Art. 31 B, sec. 6(e), as amended by Ch. 283, Acts of 1963.
Application denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.