Marcus Hackerman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Marcus HACKERMAN, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on a petition for review filed by the taxpayer; and due consideration having been given the oral arguments and briefs of both the taxpayer and the Commissioner and, likewise, the entire record in the cause;
The decision of the Tax Court holding that there are deficiencies as stated in the income tax of the petitioner for the years 1946 and 1947 is sustained, upon the basis of its findings of fact and for the reasons given in its opinion.
It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.