TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Household Finance Corporation v. Woodrow Wilbur Groscost, Household Finance Corporation v. Sadie Ruth Groscost

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Woodrow Wilbur GROSCOST, Appellee; HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Sadie Ruth GROSCOST, Appellee

Household Fin. Corp. v. Woodrow Wilbur Groscost, Household Fin. Corp. v. Sadie Ruth Groscost, 230 F.2d 608 (6th Cir. 1956)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 20, 1956
Docket
No. 12612_1
Judges
Martin, McALLISTER, Per Curiam, Stewart
Citations
230 F.2d 6081956 U.S. App. LEXIS 4365

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The Household Finance Corporation has appealed from the orders of the district court overruling its petition for review as an objecting creditor to the discharge of the bankrupt, and affirming the judgment and order of the Referee in Bankruptcy. The basis of the objection to the discharge was placed on Section 14, sub. c(3) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 32 , sub. c(3), which prevents the discharge if the bankrupt has obtain *609 ed money or property on credit, or has obtained an extension or renewal of credit by making a materially false statement in writing respecting his financial condition.

The Referee found from the evidence that, in fact, the finance company did not rely upon the financial statements in question, having dealt with the bankrupt husband and wife for a period of five years with the result that the company knew, or should have known, the financial condition of the bankrupts. The district judge affirmed the ruling of the Referee, thereby making the findings concurrent.

Accordingly, upon the reasoning disclosed in the Certificate of Review filed by the Referee, and upon the basis of his findings and conclusions sustained by the evidence and upheld by the district judge, the judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1962: 11964: 11970: 11971: 11972: 21979: 119622026peak 1972 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bank of Waynesboro v. Yeiser (In re Yeiser)2 B.R. 98 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1979)
  2. Glen McDowell v. John Deere Industrial Equipment Co. And John Deere Company of Lansing, Inc.461 F.2d 48 (6th Cir. 1972)
  3. Family Finance Corp. v. Secchio65 Misc. 2d 344 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 1970)
  4. Public Finance Corp. v. Xarhakos202 A.2d 255 (Conn. App. Ct. 1964)
  5. Avco Finance Co. of Marshall v. Baker472 S.W.2d 46 (Mo. Ct. App. 1971)
  6. Seaboard Finance Co. v. Costanzo34 Misc. 2d 54 (1962)

Most recent

  1. Bank of Waynesboro v. Yeiser (In re Yeiser)2 B.R. 98 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1979)
  2. In re Fleming409 F. Supp. 415 (S.D. Miss. 1972)
  3. Glen McDowell v. John Deere Industrial Equipment Co. And John Deere Company of Lansing, Inc.461 F.2d 48 (6th Cir. 1972)
  4. Avco Finance Co. of Marshall v. Baker472 S.W.2d 46 (Mo. Ct. App. 1971)
  5. Family Finance Corp. v. Secchio65 Misc. 2d 344 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 1970)
  6. Public Finance Corp. v. Xarhakos202 A.2d 255 (Conn. App. Ct. 1964)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list