TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Carl Virgil Wacker and Norman Bebik v. United States

Carl Virgil WACKER and Norman Bebik, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Wacker v. United States, 231 F.2d 659 (4th Cir. 1956)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 9, 1956
Docket
No. 7133
Judges
Parker, Soper, Dobie
Citations
231 F.2d 6591956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3439

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence of imprisonment upon a conviction of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 and conspiracy to commit that crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , it being charged in the indictments that appellants did assault officials of the bank and put their lives in jeopardy by the use of dangerous weapons. Appellants, who were sentenced on November 23, 1955, duly noted an appeal to this court and on December 15, 1955, were allowed until February 1, 1956, to perfect their appeal but took no action to perfect it within the time allowed. The United States has filed motion to dismiss the appeal and has filed with the court a record of the proceedings in the court below.

We have examined the record and find the appeal to be entirely without merit. The defense of appellants was an alibi; but they were positively identified as being the persons who perpetrated the armed robbery of the bank and, in addition, circumstantial evidence pointed unmistakably to their guilt. Furthermore, an accomplice with whom they planned the robbery, and who came with them from Ohio to North Carolina *660 to assist in the robbery, pleaded guilty and testified fully as to how it was planned and carried out by them. The questions involved. in the case were pure questions of fact, the trial was fairly conducted, the jury was correctly charged and there was nothing in the rulings of the trial judge that would warrant our disturbing the verdict of the jury or awarding a new trial. If there were any merit in the appeal, we would overrule the motion to dismiss and set the case down for hearing in view of the length of the sentences imposed; but a careful examination of the record satisfies us that there is no merit whatever in the appeal and that the motion to dismiss should be granted.

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1962: 11963: 21964: 119622026peak 1963 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Norman Bebik302 F.2d 335 (4th Cir. 1962)
  2. United States v. Norman Bebik Carl Virgil Wacker333 F.2d 736 (4th Cir. 1964)
  3. United States v. Bebik220 F. Supp. 572 (W.D.N.C. 1963)
  4. United States v. Wacker220 F. Supp. 657 (W.D.N.C. 1963)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Norman Bebik Carl Virgil Wacker333 F.2d 736 (4th Cir. 1964)
  2. United States v. Wacker220 F. Supp. 657 (W.D.N.C. 1963)
  3. United States v. Bebik220 F. Supp. 572 (W.D.N.C. 1963)
  4. United States v. Norman Bebik302 F.2d 335 (4th Cir. 1962)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list