State v. Mercurio

State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael Mercurio, Defendant-Appellant

State v. Mercurio, 273 A.2d 24 (N.J. 1971)

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided: January 25, 1971
Judges: Per Curiam
Citations: 273 A.2d 2457 N.J. 3671971 N.J. LEXIS 292

Cited by 3

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion filed in the Appellate Division, 113 N. J. Super.

113.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →

State Appellate Courts3

Relies on it most ⓘ

State v. Pointer343 A.2d 762 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
State v. Carluccio280 A.2d 853 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971)
State v. MacK277 A.2d 410 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971)

Most recent

State v. Pointer343 A.2d 762 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
State v. Carluccio280 A.2d 853 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971)
State v. MacK277 A.2d 410 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

Depth	Case	Cited by
	In re Application of Howard Smith, 273 A.2d 24 (N.J. 1971)	18
	State v. Mercurio, 273 A.2d 65 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1970)	4

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list