TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Mundy

State v. Mundy, 273 A.2d 617 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 14, 1971
Judges
Judges Lewis, Matthews and Mintz
Citations
273 A.2d 617113 N.J. Super. 3011971 N.J. Super. LEXIS 694

Opinion

113 N.J. Super. 301 (1971) 273 A.2d 617

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

MELINDA E. MUNDY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 5, 1971. Decided January 14, 1971.

Before Judges LEWIS, MATTHEWS and MINTZ.

Mr. Sherwood H. Mundy argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Peter A. DeSarno, Special Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Clinton E. Cronin, Acting Prosecutor of Middlesex County, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Bachman for the Middlesex County Court, 113 N.J. Super. 308 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Mundy, 273 A.2d 620 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1970) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list