TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jet Motor Lines, Inc. v. Bennie Mae Lindsay, Adm'x

JET MOTOR LINES, Inc., Appellant, v. Bennie Mae LINDSAY, Adm’x, Appellee

Jet Motor Lines, Inc. v. Lindsay, 232 F.2d 889 (6th Cir. 1956)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 9, 1956
Docket
No. 12700
Judges
Allen, Martin, Miller, Per Curiam
Citations
232 F.2d 8891956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3106

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, from a judgment for $35,-000 entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of the appellee, administratrix of her deceased husband, against the appellant, Jet Motor Lines, Inc., has been heard and duly considered upon the oral arguments and briefs of the parties and upon the record in the case;

And it appearing that no reversible error was committed in the trial court and that, under Ohio law, a jury issue was presented (see, among other cases, Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Company, 132 Ohio St. 271 , 7 N.E.2d 220 ; Brown v. Wachman, 87 Ohio App. 61 , 86 N.E.2d 27 , 87 N.E.2d 271 ); and it appearing further that Ross v. Burgan, 163 Ohio St. 211 , 126 N.E.2d 592 , heavily stressed by appellant, is distinguishable on its facts;

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co., 7 N.E.2d 220 (Ohio 1937) 94
Brown v. Wackman, 87 N.E.2d 271 (Ohio Ct. App. 1949) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list