Kent v. County of Hudson
Hazel Kent, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of John F. Crosby, Deceased, and General Administratrix of the Estate of John F. Crosby, Deceased, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. County of Hudson, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
Pee Cueiam.
The Appellate Division reversed a judgment entered for the defendant on a jury verdict, 102 N. J. Super.
208 (1968). We granted defendant’s petition for certification, 53 N. J.
23 (1968). We affirm substantially for the reasons given by the Appellate Division. The issue not having been raised, we express no view as to whether evidence of negligence exists in the present record.
For affirmance^—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Soiiettino and Haneman—7.
For reversal—Hone.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.