Salsman v. NAT. COMMUNITY BANK OF RUTHERFORD
Opinion
105 N.J. Super. 164 (1969) 251 A.2d 460
ELIZABETH A. SALSMAN (FORMERLY ELIZABETH A. ODGERS), INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR J. ODGERS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
NATIONAL COMMUNITY BANK OF RUTHERFORD, A BANKING CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
v.
HAROLD BRESLOW AND THE FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 10, 1969. Decided March 19, 1969.
Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEWIS.
Mr. William R. Morrison argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs, attorneys).
Mr. John R. Weigel argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. James L.R. Lafferty and James L. McKeon, Jr. of counsel; Messrs. Lafferty, Rowe, McMahon & McKeon, attorneys).
*165 PER CURIAM.
The judgment herein is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Botter in his opinion reported at 102 N.J. Super. 482 ( Law Div. 1968).
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 29 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.