Commonwealth v. Segida
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Paul A. SEGIDA, Respondent
Opinion
*525 ORDER PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
(1) In finding insufficient evidence to support the [75 Pa. C.S.] § 3802(a)(1) DUI offense, did [the] Superior Court err in determining what the elements are for a [Section 3802(a)(1)] DUI offense and err in concluding it is an “at the time of driving” offense?
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.