TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Anne K. Heublein and Gilbert W. Heublein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Anne K. HEUBLEIN and Gilbert W. Heublein, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Heublein v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 233 F.2d 426 (2d Cir. 1956)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 15, 1956
Docket
Nos. 274, Docket 23935
Judges
Frank, Lumbard, Per Curiam, Waterman
Citations
233 F.2d 42649 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 12391956 U.S. App. LEXIS 5106

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The taxpayer, Gilbert W. Heublein, is a doctor who during 1950 and 1951 employed two other doctors in his practice. The employment contract provided that, in addition to the salaries paid by the taxpayer to the employees, he would accrue in their favor certain percentages of the income from the practice. At the termination of the period of the contract the employee doctors were to have the option to enter into a partnership with the taxpayer. If they entered into such a partnership, the amounts accrued in their favor were to be credited against the purchase of an interest in the taxpayer’s equipment and practice. If the employees chose not to enter into a partnership, they would receive no benefit from the amounts accrued. When the employment contract terminated in 1952, the two employees elected not to enter into partnership with the taxpayer and thereby forfeited all rights arising from the accrued credits. See Godfrey v. Heublein, 2 Cir., 1955, 219 F.2d 654 . The taxpayer made his income tax returns at all times on the cash basis, and in 1950 and 1951 he deducted the amounts accrued in favor of his two employees in computing his net income. The Commissioner disallowed these deductions and the Tax Court sustained the Commissioner.

The Tax Court was quite clearly correct. Even if the taxpayer had made his returns on the accrual basis, he would not have been entitled to the deductions involved here. The liabilities to his employees were wholly contingent on the formation of the partnership ; the extent of their contingency was made manifest by subsequent events. A contingent liability may not be deducted. Security Flour Mills v. Commissioner, 1944, 321 U.S. 281 , 64 S.Ct. 596 , 88 L.Ed. 725 . The liability may only be taken as a deduction in a year when all of the events have occurred which fix the fact of liability. Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Commissioner, 1944, 320 U.S. 516 , 64 S.Ct. 364 , 88 L. Ed. 420 .

Furthermore, cash basis taxpayers may only take a deduction in the year when the expense is paid. J. H. Martinus & Sons v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 1940, 116 F.2d 732 . Here nothing was paid either in money or property. Mann v. Commissioner, 1929, 59 App.D. C. 103, 35 F.2d 873 .

For these reasons and those stated in the opinion of Judge Tietjens, T.C.Mem. Dec. 21,304 (October 27, 1955) we affirm the decision of the Tax Court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1959: 11961: 119592026peak 1959 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Herald A. O'Neill and G. Evelyn O'neill, His Wife v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue271 F.2d 44 (9th Cir. 1959)
  2. Shippy v. United States199 F. Supp. 842 (D.S.D. 1961)

Most recent

  1. Shippy v. United States199 F. Supp. 842 (D.S.D. 1961)
  2. Herald A. O'Neill and G. Evelyn O'neill, His Wife v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue271 F.2d 44 (9th Cir. 1959)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Sec. Flour Mills Co. v. Comm'r, 321 U.S. 281 (1944) 368
Dixie Pine Prods. Co. v. Comm'r, 320 U.S. 516 (1944) 306
Godfrey v. Heublein, 219 F.2d 654 (2d Cir. 1955) 3
Mann v. Comm'r, 35 F.2d 873 (D.C. Cir. 1929) 3
J. H. Martinus & Sons v. Comm'r, 116 F.2d 732 (9th Cir. 1940) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list