In re Nomination Paper of Nader
Opinion
858 A.2d 58 (2004)
In re NOMINATION PAPER of Ralph NADER and Peter Miguel Camejo as Candidates of an Independent Political Body for President and Vice President in the General Election of November 2, 2004
Linda S. Serody, Roderick J. Sweets, Ronald Bergman, Richard Trinclisti, Terry Trinclisti, Bernie Cohen-Scott, Donald G. Brown and Julia A. O'Connell, Objectors
Appeal of Ralph Nader and Peter Miguel Camejo, and their Independent Electors.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted September 10, 2004. Decided September 20, 2004.
Samuel C. Stretton, West Chester, for Peter Miguel Camejo and Ralph Nader, appellants
Christopher K. Walters, Philadelphia, Daniel I. Booker, Pittsburgh, Ira Steven Lefton, Philadelphia, for Linda S. Serody.
Jeremy David Feinstein, Pittsburgh, Milind Madhukar Shah, Philadelphia, for Roderick J. Sweets.
Efrem M. Grail, Pittsburgh, for Ronald Bergman, appellee.
Cynthia E. Kernick, Pittsburgh, for Richard Trinclisti.
Brian Anthony Gordon, Gregory M. Harvey, Philadelphia, for Julia A. O'Connell.
Louis Lawrence Boyle, for Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation.
Before: CAPPY, C.J., CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2004, the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated August 30, 2004 is REVERSED and VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED on an expedited basis for hearings on the Petition to Set Aside the Nomination Papers of Ralph Nader and Peter Miguel Camejo.
The Petition for Review of the Denial of a Request for a Stay and Supersedeas is dismissed as moot.
Opinion to follow.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.