TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Donahue v. PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE COMMONWEALTH

Donahue v. Pub. Sch. Employees'Ret. Sys. of the Commonwealth, 858 A.2d 1162 (Pa. 2004)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 22, 2004
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
858 A.2d 1162861 A.2d 259580 Pa. 14

Opinion — Per Curiam

858 A.2d 1162 (2004)

Patricia DONAHUE and Madeleine F. Pierucci, Appellants

v.

PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania; Board of Trustees of the Public School Employees' Retirement System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; State Employees' Retirement System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Board of Trustees of the State Employees' Retirement System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Honorable Barbara Hafer, Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Public School Retirement System of Pennsylvania, Nicholas J. Maiale, Chair of the Board of Trustees of the State Employees' Retirement System, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

September 22, 2004.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2005: 12006: 12011: 120052026peak 2005 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kelley v. State Employees' Retirement Board890 A.2d 1173 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2006)
  2. Larsen v. State Employees' Retirement System22 A.3d 316 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011)
  3. Donahue v. Public School Employees' Retirement System of Pennsylvania543 U.S. 1122 (2005)

Most recent

  1. Larsen v. State Employees' Retirement System22 A.3d 316 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011)
  2. Kelley v. State Employees' Retirement Board890 A.2d 1173 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2006)
  3. Donahue v. Public School Employees' Retirement System of Pennsylvania543 U.S. 1122 (2005)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list