TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Toft v. Ketchum

Howard Lionel Toft, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary G. Ketchum, Defendant-Respondent

Toft v. Ketchum, 114 A.2d 863 (N.J. 1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 20, 1955
Judges
Vanderbilt, Heher, Oliphant, Jacobs, Brennan, Wacheneeld, Burling
Citations
114 A.2d 86318 N.J. 6111955 N.J. LEXIS 28052 A.L.R. 2d 1208
Cited by 10

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Vanderbilt heretofore filed. Mr. Justice Jacobs votes to affirm for the reasons expressed in his concurring opinion previously filed. Mr. Justice Waehenfeld and Mr. Justice Burling vote to reverse for the reasons expressed in their respective dissenting opinions previously filed. See 18 N. J.

280 (1955).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Jacobs and Brennan — 5.

For reversal — Justices Wacheneeld and Burling — 2.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1962: 11976: 11977: 21978: 11979: 11980: 11985: 11986: 11991: 119622026peak 1977 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Evinger1979 OK 127, 604 P.2d 844
  2. Weisberg v. Rafael67 B.R. 392 (N.D. Ill. 1986)
  3. DeLaurentis v. City of New Haven597 A.2d 807 (Conn. 1991)
  4. Devlin v. Greiner371 A.2d 380 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1977)
  5. Alswang v. Claybon351 N.E.2d 285 (Ill. App. Ct. 1976)
  6. In re Grand Jury Proceedings503 F. Supp. 9 (D.N.J. 1980)

Most recent

  1. DeLaurentis v. City of New Haven597 A.2d 807 (Conn. 1991)
  2. Weisberg v. Rafael67 B.R. 392 (N.D. Ill. 1986)
  3. Grodjesk v. Faghani487 A.2d 759 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1985)
  4. In re Grand Jury Proceedings503 F. Supp. 9 (D.N.J. 1980)
  5. In re Evinger1979 OK 127, 604 P.2d 844
  6. In re Alswang375 N.E.2d 126 (Ill. 1978)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Toft v. Ketchum, 113 A.2d 671 (N.J. 1955) 44
Mahoney v. Nitroform Co., 114 A.2d 863 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list