TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Giumarra v. Harrington Heights, Inc.

Charles Giumarra, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. Harrington Heights, Inc., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Defendant

Giumarra v. Harrington Heights, Inc., 114 A.2d 720 (N.J. 1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 20, 1955
Judges
Vanderbilt, Heher, Jacobs, Brennan, Oliphant, Burling
Citations
114 A.2d 72018 N.J. 5481955 N.J. LEXIS 276
Cited by 22 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Goldmann in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Jacobs and Brennan — 4.

For affirmance on the principal appeal and reversal on the counterclaim — Justices Oliphant and Burling — 2.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 22 cases

View all citing references →
1956: 21958: 21959: 11960: 11964: 21969: 11971: 11972: 11975: 11980: 11981: 21982: 11986: 11991: 11992: 11996: 22010: 119562026peak 1956 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)
  2. Donovan v. Bachstadt453 A.2d 160 (N.J. 1982)
  3. Notch View Associates v. Smith615 A.2d 676 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1992)
  4. Van Dyk Research Corp. v. SCM Corp. (In re Van Dyk Research Corp.)13 B.R. 487 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1981)
  5. Pickett v. Lloyds600 A.2d 148 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1991)
  6. Daly v. Auricchio (In re Auricchio)196 B.R. 279 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1996)

Most recent

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)
  2. County of Morris v. Fauver685 A.2d 1342 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1996)
  3. Daly v. Auricchio (In re Auricchio)196 B.R. 279 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1996)
  4. Notch View Associates v. Smith615 A.2d 676 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1992)
  5. Pickett v. Lloyds600 A.2d 148 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1991)
  6. Strauss v. Fost517 A.2d 143 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list